Why do DC Democrats insist on underestimating Lieberman's determination to kick them in the balls?
There's being magnanimous, and then there's being self-defeating. Obama's team is sending the message that they don't hold any grudges. Likewise, Senators are reminding everyone that he agrees with them on almost every issue. My question: if that's the case, why can't we make him chairman of a committee that deals with one of those issues then, and take him off of Homeland Security where his views are diametrically opposed to Obama's and the Democrats?
[UPDATE: Looks like Reid will have a caucus-wide vote next week to determine the fate of Joe's chairmanship. Not a bad way to go, I guess. Here's hoping it's a secret ballot.]